Education Medication Error The United State, Health Care...

Education medication error The United State, health care system wastes approximately 700 billion dollars yearly on systematic inefficiencies such as unnecessary procedures, frauds, administrative practices and errors ( Plonien, 2013). Medication administration error differs across the literature, it may be defined as a preventable event or deviation from procedures, policies and/or best practices that may result to inappropriate desired outcome in a patient. The vast majority of medication error occurs due to deviation in the standard procedure for medication administration ( Admi, et al., 2013). Medication errors compromise patient care and potentially leads to increase in debt for the institution. The source of errors are numerous†¦show more content†¦In nursing education, students are educated on the importance of using the medication â€Å"five rights† to practice and prevent drug administration errors. The nurse plays an important role in medication administrati on and should focus on error prevention. ( Escolar-Chua et al., 2013). Medication errors are not only caused by human errors, technology defects contributes to this growing epidemic. Computerized prescribed order entry, bar-coding systems, electronic medication administration and automated dispensing cabinets all contributes to medication errors. However the use of these technologies have included benchmarking to help healthcare facilities test and evaluate new systems for use on the units (Admi, et al., 2013). Some errors affects patient minimally, whereas other medication errors results in patient morbidity and mortality. Despite the efforts, medication errors remains problematic in the area of healthcare. It is the health care organizations biggest challenge. Numerous research has been done to identify factors that would reduce medication error, however the emphasis on error management has been minimally to nonexistent (Admi, et al., 2013). Researchers have identified that hosp italized patients are subject to one medication administration error per day, implying that approximately 1.5 million preventable drug event arise yearly in the United State. Medication errors are among the most common medical error, costing more than 3.5 billion

Analysis Of Al Tech Manufacturing Company - 1331 Words

Al-tech Manufacturing company is in need of a change in its ability to maximize profit during a difficult market. In order for Al-Tech to make changes and pursue a goal of stable profitable company. Al-Tech is constructing change in the organization in accordance to a second-order type two transformation (Ian Palmer, 2009). During an second-order type two transformation, an organization will make alteration in order to rearrange, reduce, and reengineer the nature of the organization according to Ian Palmer, Richard Dunford, and Gib Akin second edition managing organizational change text book chapter four (Ian Palmer, 2009). Al-Tech merged with a rivaling company, Border Manufacturing, in order to maximize profit and reduce overhead†¦show more content†¦Undoubtedly the changes that Al-Tech made had an adverse effect on the staff of both companies. The merger of the two companies took place, and in conclusion, the merger had some requirements that had to meet in order to facil itate both companies. The payroll department of Al-Tech was downsized from a staff of 12 to now a staff of 10. The company decided to lay off my boss and four other team members. The company then decided to place two staff members from BM to work on my team. The two members from BM, John, and Kerry, are from a different culture and have different ideals as how the department staff should effectively utilize their time during the work day. The two staff members from BM have begun rubbing of on the other staff members in some good and bad ways. Bob, a member of Al-Tech, is now considering employment elsewhere as a result of the merger. Jill is not performing at her best due to the layoffs and is now confused as to what are the specifics job duties that she has to perform. As a result, Jill is asking me to produce written documentation of what the requirements are. Anne, the life of the staff, is now gone dormant in fear of termination. The staff presents a great challenge to the supervisor, as there are different area that have to be covered and addressed in order to get the staff to function as a team. The supervisor must address the culturally diverse new members of the team, and find

Patrick O Dea McGold free essay sample

Reporting government claims as immutable facts, the media virtually set the stage for the longest and undoubtedly one of the most controversial wars in American history. By its conclusion, the Vietnam War had resulted in nearly 60,000 American deaths and 2 million Vietnamese deaths. The Cold War period consumed America during the 1 9605. Any aggressive Communist move was perceived as a threat to democracy. Responding to these Gulf of Tontine reports, nearly all of America jumped to the same conclusion.The overwhelming majority incontrovertibly believed the nefarious North Vietnamese had been the aggressors, and thee. S. Was not only entitled, but had a duty as a democratic nation, to seek retaliation. Throughout this time of national tension and angst, it would take quite a courageous and valiant figure to seek out the truth and express peaceful aspirations. This man was Senator Wayne Morse of Oregon, and in doing so, he absolutely proved to be one of the most heroic Americans in the twentieth century. We will write a custom essay sample on Patrick O Dea McGold or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page The truth behind the Gulf of Tontine incident was quite different from what had been reported.Rather than on routine patrol, the U. S. Destroyer Maddox as actually conducting an aggressive espionage mission, collecting intelligence about North Vietnamese defenses. In addition, despite the proposal of Captain John Heroic that the ambiguous circumstances surrounding the situation including darkness, stormy seas and nervous, inexperienced crewmen warranted a through investigation, Secretary of defense Robert Mascara told Congress there was unequivocal proof of the second unprovoked attack on U. S. Ships (Ford, 2008).As a result, on August 7, 1964, within hours of Mascaras dogmatic assertions, Congress passed the Gulf of Tontine Resolution by an astonishing margin of 416-0 in the House and 88-2 in the Senate (Kim, 2009). This resolution, which essentially served as a green light for the Vietnam War, authorized president Lyndon Johnson to engage American troops without a formal declaration of war. Eventually, more than eight million U. S. Military personnel would serve and fighting would spread from North and South Vietnam to Laos and Cambodia. Morse, who was one of the two Senators to vote nay, was unalterably opposed to this belligerence.He dubbed the conflict Mascaras War, and declared I believe that within the next century, future generations will look tit dismay and great disappointment upon a Congress which is now about to make such a historic mistake (Ford, 2008). Despite tremendous pressure from the press in his home state of Oregon and nationwide, Morse stood firm in his peaceful aspirations. Even the most reluctant members of Congress took a belligerent position after hearing about the so-called North Vietnamese assault Morse, together with Alaskan Senator Ernest Greening, formally opposed the resolution on constitutional grounds.Article of the Constitution establishes the president as commander-and- chief of the military, but for the purpose of checks and lances, Congress is given the power to declare war. Under the Gulf of Tontine Resolution, Morse believed, Congress had surrendered its power, and in doing so, had surrendered the power of the people that it was elected to represent. In Moors?s words, Congress had given the president and the military a blank check, to be paid with taxpayers money and citizens lives (Brooks, 2006). Over the next four years, Morse continued to be a paradigm of courage and willpower. He was unrelenting in his search for the truth, and proved to be adamant in his willingness to challenge authority. Despite the injurious uniqueness that it had on his political career, he dared to question not just the possibility that the U. S. Could win the war, but the morality of U. S. Involvement as well. He passionately contended that our democratic nation had no right to impose its will on the rest of the world.On national television in 1 964, Morse boldly declared, I dont know why we think, just because were mighty, that we have the right to try to substitute might for right (Solomon, 2001). Throughout the war, Senator Morse continued to overtly disparage the deceptive practices of President Johnson and his administration. He was retainer not afraid to speak his mind, especially taking issue with the fact that the Johnson administration habitually withheld pertinent information from the American public, as it had during the Gulf of Tontine Resolution.As is the case for most iconoclasts, Morse eventually suffered the consequences for his political dissent. After four consecutive six-year terms in the U. S. Senate, Morse was defeated in the 1968 election by Robert Packwood. A clever and slick politician, Packwood accentuated Morsels antiwar fervor during the ardently contested campaign. He repeatedly asserted that Morse was foolish in objecting to the U. S. Taking retaliatory action against the North Vietnamese (Brooks, 2006).He believed that by not taking action, American soldiers would be left essentially helpless. Packwood victory undoubtedly can be attributed to this assertion, because although the Vietnam War caused the greatest division in the country since the Civil War, essentially all Americans agreed that the soldiers safety was the top priority. From the time that he was defeated until his death in 1974, Morse essentially became a political pariah in the minds of the American public. His views were controversial, and his attitude, dogmatic.Despite public opinion, Senator Morse indefatigably displayed the resolve and the determination to stand up for what he believed in, not because he was looking for gratitude, but because he truly had the courage to do so. One man with courage, Andrew Jackson said, makes a majority.

Proposition 227 The Crisis Of Democracy And The Indoctrination Of Our

Proposition 227: The Crisis Of Democracy And The Indoctrination Of Our Children Proposition 227: The Crisis of Democracy And the Indoctrination Of our Children By H. Michael Moya English 2 Professor Deena Hutchinson November 29th, 1999 Literacy for cultural reproduction uses institutional mechanisms to undermine independent thought, a prerequisite for the Orwellian manufacture of consent or engineering of consent. In this light, schools are seen as the ideological institutions designed to prevent the so-called crisis of democracy, another Orwellian concept, meaning the beginnings of democracy....... In fact, this very perspective on schools was proposed by the Trilateral Commission.This commission was created in response to the general democratic participation of masses of people in the Western world in questioning their governments ethical behavior. Its major purpose, as many understand it, was to seek ways to maintain the Western capitalists cultural hegemony. The Trilateral Commission referred to schools as institutions responsible for the indoctrination of the young. Noam Chomsky stated it simply: The Trilateral Commission argued that schools should be institutions for indoctrination, for imposing obedience, fo r blocking the possibility of independent thought, and they play an institutional role in a system of control and coercion. -Donaldo Macedo Literacies of Power The vulnerability of democratic government in the United States (thus) comes not primarily from external threats, though such threats are real, nor from internal subversion from the left or the right, although both possibilities could exist, but rather from the internal dynamics of democracy itself in a highly educated, mobilized, and participant society. -The Crisis of Democracy: Report on the Governability Of Democracies to the Trilateral Commission English Only. Official English. Americanism. Bilingual Education. These issues have emerged in the political and social arena to insight debate on the national, regional and local levels. Given the vast spectrum of differing viewpoints and opinions, it is no wonder that bilingual education has turned into such a heated battle. The struggle rages not only in the education debate, but in the areas of social welfare, civil rights and racial discrimination, intellectual arenas, and the politics of immigration. Generally speaking, until the early 1980's, America has taken English as the official language of the Union for granted. Noone ever questioned the use of English as the common denominator among our melting pot society. Therefore no additional legislation was ever lrequired to protect the English language from being undermined in some way. However, recently there have been drastic demographic changes taking place in various regions of the country. Immigration of linguistic minorities in large numbers has moved in like a wind current onto the bilingual education fire. Although this is not unusual, considering that immigrants from all over the world have been pouring into the nation for centuries, what is now making their presence such a huge concern is that they are requiring social services on a large scale in their native language. Government agencies are being pressured into providing these various services in languages other than the generally accepted English language. In 1974 the Supreme Court upheld an Office of Civil Rights regulation which interpreted the 1964 Civil rights Act to apply to persons with a language deficiency when protecting against prejudice based on national origin. This ruling was universally used as the basis for implementing bilingual education programs throughout the country. These are the roots of the current English Only movement in response to the spread of bilingual education. The debate started officially in 1981, Senator S.I. Hayakawa lobbied Congress to make English the Official language of the Union by amending the Constitution. As we all well know, amending the Constitution is no small task. The bill proposed to make official what was already obviously taken for granted. Hayakawa did not stop there. He included in his bill provisions that would prohibit federal and state laws, ordinances, regulations, orders, programs, and policies from requiring the use of other languages. The bill not only attempted to make Englis h official, but it also attempted to ban any other language. This went counter to campaigns started during the 1960's to accommodate the needs of linguistic minorities. Since the introduction of Hayakawa's Official English bill in 1981, a political movement has grown around the issue which has polarized people from all over the nation. Supporters quickly point out that English has always